Dr Vinograd's Best ToothPaste
(619) 378-1565 for appointments
Brighton Dental San DiegoBrighton Dental San Diego on YelpBrighton Dental San Diego on Google Plus

Dental Implants – Teeth with Titanium P3

It’s really boring.  You’ve got to sit there, and you watch this thing slowly going in.  You know, great, next.  Let’s get going.  It’s just the nature of you, and we have to patience.  We want everything done right away, but it’s absolutely critical that you do that.

The drills that they use is very critical.  We use new drills for every patient because if they’re new drills, they’re sharp.  If they’re sharp, they’re going to cut efficiently.  They’re not going to generate heat.  So, you don’t want to get cheap and use recycled drill that’s been sterilized again because it may not be cutting as sharply as a new drill.

So, those are important parts in the atraumatic portion of the surgery and the period of healing without loading on it.

Before osseointegration became popular, which start in North America in 1984, 1985, the Swedes were very good about this.  They did not, in fact, let the rest of the world know about it until they had treated patients for almost 10 years, and had a long-term success before they published any data in their literature that everybody else could read.  Basically, they were being conservative.  They wanted to make sure that they had a process that worked because dental implants, as I told you before, were fraught with failure.

There was no dental implant system that was predictable.  Every dentist around had tried something.  You can see how crazy this person must have been.   This is like modern art.  We can hang it up in MOA downtown.  It’s job-owned.  They made a casting out of chrome cobalt metal which is now being placed under the gums and teeth put on it, and these things never worked.  Their 5-year success rate was less than 30%.

The people still went through and had these things done because they had no alternative, and there were about 20-30% of the patients that they worked for about 10 years but were really not successful.  The downside or the reason why these different implants did not work was primarily because (a) they were not made out of titanium, (b) the surgery was not done atraumatically (it was quick), and (c) the teeth were put on it right away.  It didn’t give it a chance to allow the bone to heal on the surface of the implant.

All of these failed, and if you go back historically, you can see all sorts of shapes and sizes and materials that we used.  They had different names to them but were really, really unpredictable.  When I started my residency in 1987, we actually spent more time treating patients where these had to be taken out than the osseointegrated implants that we were putting in there because of the problems that these created.

The other interesting thing that this group did with osseointegration was they standardize the whole process.  They made standard-diameter screws.  They made the system predictable.  You would just go and buy it.  If you look at it and say, it’s pretty crazy to have a screw fits all.  It’s really not predictable for patients with different dimensions of bone and different requirements, but that’s what they started out with.

They started out with that because the patients that they were treating initially for their first 10 years were patients with no teeth at all and had trouble with their lower dentures.  They almost could not wear the lower dentures, and so they said, “Let’s try and use a new technology to test it on people where we have no other option.”  If it works for that group of patients, which is what happened, then these systems were modified to adapt them to other clinical scenarios like we have today.

So, these screws were basically 3.75mm in diameter, and they came in different lengths.  In the early days, they were actually only in 7, 8.5, and 10.  That’s all they made because they were little old ladies whose jawbones were pretty small.  They resorbed a ton of weight.  They’ve worn dentures for 20, 30 years, and nothing remained.

This was the first screw that was put in the jawbone, and then the second step was to connect a cylinder of some sort to the implant that then came through the gums into the mouth.  The teeth were made and attached at this level.  It was a pillared system.  There was a screw that went into the bone. There was an intermediate component that attached this implant and brought it to the gum into the mouth, and then you made the tooth that got attached to that.  That was the system that was done originally.

Now, one of the changes that modified this from us using it in patients who had no teeth at all was what was still today, and it was done in 1990.  It’s called the UCLA abutment where the intermediate part was actually eliminated, and you could make a tooth by using this plastic part that you then waxed and made a tooth out of gold or porcelain that could be directly screwed to the implant like that one tooth X-ray that I showed you in the mouth.  That’s what it was like, and you’ll see more of these in a bit.

Talking about clinical applications.  We’re going to split this up into three categories:  the edentulous patient (that means somebody who was not teeth), partially edentulous (they’ve got a few teeth), and then we also use them in our cancer patients who are missing more than just teeth and major parts of their jaw structure.  This is what we’re talking about where somebody’s got a large facial tumor and has lost a lot of structure.  We’re trying to use these screws to help anchor some sort of prosthesis and make them presentable in society.

When we look at the patients who have no teeth, it’s important to know what the success rates are, and if you look at these success rates that was a 15-year follow-up that was published from the original group in 1981, they claim the success in the upper jaw was 89%.  The success in the lower jaw was 100%.  That doesn’t make sense does it?  Nothing in medicine and dentistry is 100%.  It can’t be.

They have these and other numbers in parenthesis.  What they were trying to tell you was that if somebody in the lower jaw was missing all their teeth and they put five screws in this person’s lower jawbone or five implants, that patient may have lost one implant, but if four remained, they were still allowed to give them the teeth which was the original objective of the treatment.  So, you could provide teeth on four implants instead of five, and therefore, it was considered a success.

Am I clear to everybody about what’s going on there with the success?  So, if you put 100 screws in somebody’s jawbone, only 91 of those screws really took.  Nine of the screws didn’t take in the lower jaw, but because they were spread out, they were not all nine in the same patient, there were enough in one patient to allow them to give the patient teeth which is what this patient came in for.

In the upper jaw, that was not the case because in the upper jaw, only 81% of every plant that was placed was successful.  So, 19 out of every 100 were lost.  You could end up with a patient who put four or five in, and all five were lost in that patient and they couldn’t get a prosthesis.  So, the success rate in the upper jaw was 89%.

Why does that happen?  Well, two reasons.  First of all, the upper jawbone is a much, much softer jawbone as compared to the lower jawbone.  The lower jawbone is much denser and harder, and therefore, it provides a greater chance for the implant to be stabilized and held in place, a critical part of it.

The second part is that in the upper jawbone, we have these sinus cavities that come down, and you have your nose in the middle.  When you’ve lost a lot of jawbone, there isn’t a lot of area remaining for us to put implants in.  You end up with shorter jaw implants and fewer numbers.  Therefore, they were not as successful.

In the lower jawbone, typically, if you were to go between where my two fingers are right now, there’s a nerve that comes right about here.  It’s called the mental nerve.  Between those two areas, there is no anatomical structure that’s going to limit you from putting the screw in there in majority of the patients.  Therefore, you can get enough numbers of implants that would allow you to have a successful result.

What are the type of the teeth that were made for these patients who are edentulous?  We break them down into three terms:  a hybrid bridge—this was what traditionally done. Teeth that look like this; teeth on stilts.  Titanium coming through the jawbone, and then teeth screwed on to that. A very primitive way, but that’s what was used in the early days and even today in some of the patients in the lower jaw.

This doesn’t work very well in the upper jaw because what happens when most people smile and laugh?  They show their teeth.  They show their upper gum.  You typically don’t show your lower teeth.  So, if you had a scenario like this in your upper jaw, you’d be blowing bubbles of saliva at your guest.  It wouldn’t be very friendly.  There would be spinach that would be stuck, and it would be showing and not so aesthetically.  Therefore, we really didn’t do these kinds of prosthesis in the upper jaw.

We’ll show you what we did in most of those patients so you can understand what the differences are in the type of the prosthesis.  Take you through some of the steps involved.  This is the lower jaw treated in the traditional manner where there’s five implants, so five screws, that are coming in to the mouth.  This is the second part already attached.  Remember that pillar system that I showed you coming through the gums.  We have to attach some metal pieces on there to actually make a mold so we can capture the position of these.  We need to be able to generate a model of some sort because we can’t make the teeth.  We can’t weld stuff in your mouth.  We got to do this outside.

So, things have to be made outside so we have to accurately replicate this position on a stone model or a plaster model that we can then go make teeth on.  Try them on, and then make sure that they’re successful.  We first try the teeth in the mouth to make sure that the bite is correct.  Based on that, we then have to make a metal structure that’s cast that fits the implants, and then, the teeth are actually bonded or attached to that metal structure.

So when you look in the mouth or an X-ray here, you see the implant part A, part B that comes through the gum into the mouth, and part C, the metal casting that which the teeth are attached.  It’s quite an elaborate process which takes a lot of time to do.  Typically, doing something like this is going to take seven appointments after the implants are ready to be used, and they’re about a couple of weeks apart and a lot of time and effort in the lab and expense that goes with it.  When it’s finished, this is what the patient ends up looking like, and most of these patients are actually very pleased with the outcome that they end up with.

Now, I said to you that these hybrid bridges wouldn’t work very well in the upper jaw, and I also showed to you that there were five implants that were placed.  What does that do?  Well, it’s a number of things.  Sometimes patients, medically, are not candidates for extensive surgery, or the costs of putting five implants in and making that superstructure may make that treatment something that is not realistic for them.

So, what other ways can we use the implants to provide this treatment to a larger group of patients?  This is what happened in North America.  We were very good, in those days, at saving one or two teeth on patients and using them to anchor a denture.  So, instead of having a denture sitting and floating around the gums, if we could keep two or three roots, we would hold on to them.  They were called overdentures because we were keeping some of the roots, and keeping the roots helped maintain the bones.  We felt, why can’t we use that concept with implants?

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Dental Implants – Teeth with Titanium P2

This turns us around to osseointegration, and what is osseointegration?  It’s pretty interesting.  A lot of things that get discovered in science actually get discovered accidentally, or the person who’s looking or researching a particular aspect is looking at something and the outcome is totally different.

Osseointegration was actually discovered in the late 1950s and early 1960s by a Swedish orthopedic surgeon by the name of Professor Branemark.  What he was doing was studying how bone heals in animals.  He wanted to know what the healing process is, and this is in the late 1950s.  What they had done in their lab was, they had animals (rabbits) that they placed a cylinder, made out of metal, through the skin into the long bone. It had a glass opening through which they could look in with the microscope and see what blood flow was going on and what cells were coming in this area of trauma.

They studied this for about 45 days, and when they finished the study, they went to remove this metal chamber out.  They couldn’t get it out.  The lab had made that chamber out of titanium because we knew titanium was an inert material that did not elicit a lot of response.  So, he didn’t want something that was put in there that created inflammation because if it did, you wouldn’t be able to study the normal healing process which is what he was looking at.

So, this titanium cylinder that was placed in the bone and came out through the skin after 45 days.  When they wanted to take it out, they couldn’t get it out, and that’s when his gray cells started to turn.  He says, “This is pretty amazing,” because if you think about it, the teeth are the only organs that we have in our body that are actually embedded in the bone and penetrate soft tissue and come out into the open environment, maybe through the mouth but it’s still the outside.  You don’t have anything sticking through your skin coming out, right?  It’s not going to heal.  You’re going to get an infection, and you’re going to have a problem.

This was pretty amazing.  Not only did this stay in place for those 45 days and healed, but they couldn’t get the thing out.  So, he started to look at it and say what was really going on.  What was very interesting was that he found the lines here was a titanium surface, and what he had on this titanium surface was bone that was directly growing onto the titanium surface which was very, very unusual.

In effect, bone was treating titanium like another piece of bone, like a fracture.  You had a fracture in your bone, and the two pieces come together.  They’re going to heal against each other, provided you keep them stable and don’t allow movement to occur.  That’s why we have a plaster cast.

What was interesting in all other implants that were done before that, between the implant (the metal component) and the bone there was a layer of soft tissue which was a connective tissue, histologically.  Therefore, this is what actually what caused it to fail because if there’s no direct contact between the bone and the mini implant, that was a pathway for bacteria to get into and create and infection or inflammation.

Now, if you think of teeth, that’s what happens.  I was pointing out to you in the slide earlier that teeth are attached to the bone with a ligament, a periodontal ligament.  That’s why teeth can actually move a little bit.  That’s why kids have braces.  You can put braces on your teeth.  You can move them because if you pull the tooth in one direction, that ligament stretches in one direction, and it’s compressed on the other side.  So, the side that’s compressed, the bone’s going to resorb, and the ligament is going to come back.  The side that the ligament’s stretched, it’s actually going to grow the bone with it and close that space up.  That’s why you can move teeth.

If you put an implant in.  You can put braces on them.  They’re not moving.  They’re not going any place.  They’re integrated.  They’re solid.  They’re staying there.  The reason why teeth fail when you say gum disease, that’s periodontal disease.  That’s the periodontal ligament that’s breaking down.  That’s the one that’s getting inflamed, and bacteria’s going in.  Therefore, you end up losing teeth.

This whole process of bone actually growing on a surface of titanium was pretty amazing.  We actually still don’t understand why that happens.  We know it happens predictively, about 98% of the time.  It doesn’t have 100% of the time in healthy bone, but the question is what’s so magical about titanium that’s allowing this bone to grow on the surface?

Studies after that original one actually showed it’s not the titanium surface directly that it’s growing to.  It’s actually on to titanium oxide.  Though titanium is not a material that evokes a foreign body response in the patient, it’s bioactive and bio-inert at the same time.  If you take a piece of titanium and you put it out there, it develops a layer of titanium oxide almost instantly, and it’s this titanium oxide that the bone happens to grow to.

It’s a critical part that when the implants are being placed in surgically, that layer of titanium oxide is not disturbed because if you contaminate it, you’re going to find that the bone won’t grow to it.  So, it’s very interesting, and it happened to work.

Now, the other interesting part of this whole process was that when you had an implant placed, we wanted to be able to chew on that.  Therefore, you had to allow a period for the bone to grow first because if you just put the screw on it and you started to chew right away, you’re not providing that initial stability for the healing to occur, just like a fractured bone.  If you start chewing on it right away, you get micromovement, and you’re not going to get a boney union.  Just like a fracture site, you get a fibrous connective tissue or fibrous union.

That was a mistake that a lot of dentists made in the past because we would put teeth in there, and we would put something in the jawbone, implant something.  We would attach a tooth, and we would say, “Okay, start chewing right away.” We didn’t give it that interim period for the healing process.

The question was, “What’s changed in the last five years?” Well, the whole process of osseointegration is a whole long drawn-out process.  Because of that, you have to surgically drill a hole in bone, you place the screw, you cover up the gum, and you let it sit for three to six months, depending on how good the quality of the bone is from what the surgeon feels when he’s placing the implant in the bone.

After that three to six-month period, you go back, and you make a second little connection or cut in the gum and connect this implant to the external surface.  Only then can we put a tooth on it.  Now, most of us don’t want to wait that long.  We want patients that come in my chair want their teeth yesterday.  They don’t want to wait six months or eight months to get their teeth.

So, there are times when we can do, and you’ll hear advertisements say about teeth in a day, teeth in 24 hours, or something like that.  Yes, it’s possible in very, very selected scenarios where we could put enough number of implants, connect them all in such a way that those individual screws are not moving when people chew on them.  Even though they get teeth in a day, they’re on liquid diet for the first month.  Right.

There are important things that you need to understand because if you try to hasten the process off, you’re disturbing the concept, the initial idea that bone has to grow onto the surface of the titanium.  That’s going to take a while.  It’s not going to happen instantly.

The surfaces of these titanium, the oxide layers, have been messed with by companies.  They’re trying to make the surface more bioactive.  So, instead of sitting there passively and saying, “Hey, sell it bone.  Come grow on me,” they’ve got something put on there that’s going to make that process go a little bit faster or attract more cells.  So, instead of waiting to six months, you can wait three months.  Every implant manufacturer out there claims that their surface is superior to the next one, and it’ll heal in 15 days or two months or two weeks.  The basic concept still has to be that until the bone has not grown onto that surface of the implant, you can’t actually load it.

So, what Branemark defined osseointegration was a very simple definition.  He said there has to be a direct functional and structural connection between living bone and the surface of a load bearing implant.  That’s the critical part, load bearing.  What do we want?  We want teeth to chew on.  If you just want teeth to make them look good or you’re not going to work on it or load them, it doesn’t matter.  That is not going to be under function.

So, is this connection between the bone and the implant going to survive loading?  That’s the critical part of it.  Now, this is a slide that in this day and age is not easy to show, but this is what Professor Branemark showed around in the first few days when they were testing this theory out because after they did it on rabbits, they used beagle dogs.  They took out teeth in beagle dogs. They placed titanium implants. They let it heal. They attached a tooth, and in fact, they’re actually showing this poor beagle dog being suspended directly on this implant, just one implant.  The entire load of the dog was on that implant, and they were trying to demonstrate as to how solid that implant was.

You think about it.  You take a screw, and you put it in wood.  Unless you’ve got solid teakwood, the more load that you put on it, the screw’s going to come out because the screw’s just mechanically held in place.  There’s no bond between the screw and the wall that you placed it in, and that’s the critical part that an implant is a screw because you want that initial stabilization.  You want to be able to screw it in so it’s stable and doesn’t move around during that healing phase, but then you’re not really dependent on the threads.  The threads just happen to be there, and in fact, they are an advantage because they increase the surface area for bone-implant contact rather than having a straight flat surface because you’re going in and out.  You’re increasing it almost 30%.

When you look a tooth now, on a patient, you’re looking at a natural tooth and an implant, and you can see this a threaded screw of titanium.  This screw was placed in the bone.  This is the threaded part that I was talking about, and then we have another tooth that’s made about six months later.  It actually gets a screw going all the way through, and you can see this little screw which is holding or tightening  the natural tooth onto the implant.  This screw can then be removed.  In fact, if this tooth, which has the porcelain on it, chips or cracks, you can repair it and screw it back in.

The key part of success here is atraumatic surgery and you need a period of healing without load.  I’ve already emphasized that.  The atraumatic surgery’s very important because you want the bone that’s going to be in immediate contact with this titanium screw to be alive.

If you take a drill, and you drill it at 100,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) because if you drill really fast, what’s happening?  You’re generating a lot of heat.  If you’re generating a lot of heat, it’s killing the bone cells, and the critical part for us is the bone where these threads are going to go into.  We want this part of the bone to be alive.  If we drill too fast, too quickly, we’re going to kill that bone.  So, you’re going to have a bunch of dead bone around the titanium, and there’s going to be nothing to grow onto it.  It’s very critical that the surgeons who are doing this, do this slowly.  In fact, the last part of the drilling happens at 5revolutions per minute.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 9.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Dental Implants – Teeth with Titanium

Hi everybody!  It’s my pleasure to welcome you to the last meeting of Bionic Man & Woman and also a great pleasure to introduce Dr. Arun Sharma who has been here with you in the UC School of Dentistry for a number of years.  He wears an amazing number of hats.  He serves as professor of prosthodontics.  He’s the director of the prosthetic clinic.  He also participates in the faculty practice.  He serves as the prosthodontist for the craniofacial anomalies clinics serving children with malformed features on their faces and heads.  He also is the current editor of the Journal of Pediatric Dentistry.  I think that’s about it, but it’s an awful lot.  Please join me in welcoming Dr. Sharma who is going to talk to us about implants.

Arun Sharma:

Thank you!  What I’m going to be talking to you about is and I think I did this talk about five years ago. One of the gentlemen here reminded me, and I think it was about 2003.  His question was, “What has changed since then?”, and fortunately, not too much.  The good side of that is obviously what we have been doing has been pretty successful, and that’s what I’m going to share with you today and talk about a few things about where change is coming in how we accomplished some of the outcomes.

So, the topic that I’m going to talk about is replacing teeth, obviously, and what we are interested in using is titanium.  It’s really important that we understand the difference between how teeth and titanium, though the objective of every patient is to actually have this tooth they’re going to chew with.  It’s how this is anchored or connected to the underlying bone.  It’s very different, and as we talk about it, I’ll show you how they differ and what we have to do in order to make up for that difference between teeth and implants.

If you look at an X-ray of a natural tooth and an X-ray of a dental  implant, you can see it’s different.  It’s really screw that’s made out of titanium placed in the jawbone, and then we connect a tooth to it which is what we would call a prosthesis.

What I want to try to do is, in the next hour or so, cover a few topics related to this.  I’m going to talk about what happens when we lose teeth, what are its implications in terms of quality of life.  Implants, what are the benefits of these implants?  How do they benefit us?  We’re going to talk about this word, osseointegration, which is really what has made implant dentistry predictable.

Implants were things that have been tried by people for thousands of years.  If you go back to the Mayan culture, you will find they had bovine teeth that were removed and placed in human jaws, wired to adjacent teeth.  The Egyptians had done same sorts of things.  They’ve taken ivory, and they carved them into shapes of teeth.  They were all ways of trying to replace teeth in a way, but none of them lasted a long enough period of time in how osseointegration has really brought about that change to where it’s predictable which is what we’re looking for.

I’m going share with you clinical applications, the type of patient scenarios that we actually use these implants in, and the benefits that we have with them.  I’m also going to talk about failure because it’s not 100% successful, and we need to understand that.  We need to understand why things fail and what happens when they do fail.  These are the five basic areas that I’m going to cover.

Let’s talk about teeth.  What happens when we lose teeth?  These are typical examples of patients who show up in dental offices, and they are sometimes referred to as the dental cripple because they have lost all of their teeth in the upper jaw and they have just two teeth remaining in the lower jaw.  They’ve got what is a prosthesis or a denture or plate that is sitting on the gums, and really that is not a very effective means of replacing the masticatory apparatus that all of us have.

When you have a denture that sits on gums, you’re taking soft tissue that’s going to be squished between two hard surfaces, between the bone on one side and the hard material that the dentures are made of, and the fact that these can move around.  It’s very interesting that actually patients can do quite well with dentures or do as well with dentures as they do because you’re trying to keep this prosthesis up against gravity, and have it function through what’s going on.

Some patients tolerate this very well and some do not, and it’s very hard for us to be able to identify those patients who may not be good candidates for dentures.  My grandparents had dentures, as I can remember when I was a little kid, the little glass in the bathroom with the pink stuff, and I was like, “I don’t know what the heck that is”.  I didn’t know at that stage I would be a dentist be dealing with things like this, but it was something that most families didn’t even talk about.  I mean, they were there.

I have some patients who have had dentures for so many years that their spouses still don’t know about it.  When they come in to see me, they don’t want the spouse in the treatment room at the same time because they don’t want their spouse to actually look at them with their teeth out.  It’s a very personal thing, and to still find that some people do very well with dentures is actually quite amazing.

What’s interesting also is that most patients, surprisingly, will do better with an upper denture than they will with a lower denture, and there are some interesting reasons for that.  Partly, the upper denture is sitting on a larger surface area.  It’s got the hard palate that’s completely covered so you’ve got a bigger foundation if you think of the snowshoe effect.  You’ve got more surface area that you’re covering, and the stress from chewing is distributed over a much greater area.

Also, it’s on a jaw that’s actually not moving.  Anything that’s attached to the lower jaw—the lower jaw is the moving part of the mechanism.  The upper jaw stays stable.  So, you’ve got to have teeth attached to the lower jaw, and they need to be able to move together which is quite a challenge.

The fact that you have a tongue, which could be very active in some people, and every time you talk, you swallow, and you chew, your tongue moves.  The chance of this denture that’s staying in close proximity to the tongue is going to be dislodged and food’s going to get underneath it.  So, it tends to be much more uncomfortable.

The other part of it that’s pretty interesting is that we know when people lose their teeth, there is a decrease in their ability to chew.  That varies on many factors like when the teeth were lost and what their experience was in terms of were the teeth lost at one time an completely replaced versus you’ve lost one tooth or two teeth and you had a smaller bridge and it’s gradually increased in size, you learn to adapt.

It’s also easier for younger people to accept dentures than it is for somebody who’s older because adaptation’s just much more difficult, and you’ve gotten used to having your own teeth for such a long period of time that it’s not easy to get used to something new in your mouth.

We do know from a number of studies that dentures, the best case scenario, are only about 20% as efficient as natural teeth.  So, there is a significant drop in somebody’s ability to chew, and when you think about that, it then restricts the diet.  There are some papers that talk about the other health issues that come up with that because you’re eating softer foods.  You’re not chewing your food as well.  You’re probably avoiding certain things like lettuce and salads.  You’re probably eating more processed foods that are high in sodium.  There’re issues that are related to the fact that people’s diets change when the masticatory efficiency goes down.

There’s a comfort issue when you lose teeth because you are dealing with an artificial substance, something that was not really meant to be there.  It’s been designed by us.  The interesting part of all this is that in prosthesis or any artificial device that’s made, dentures still are way more efficient when you compare them to natural teeth versus losing a leg or losing an arm or losing an eye.  When you talk about those prosthesis, what do they give back in terms of what the original was?  Teeth, or dentures, are far superior in spite of them only being about 20%.

There’s a psychological component, just like I mentioned earlier, where we have patients whose spouses have never really seen them without the teeth in their mouth, and they just don’t want to be in that position that anybody should know that teeth are missing.  So, there is a psychological component for people wanting to hang on even to that one last tooth like the patient I showed you in the last screen who had two teeth in the lower jaw and did not want to lose them because  there was an attachment to having these teeth for a long period of time.

When they come to people like me, we look at them and say, “Well what is the purpose of these teeth?  They’re not really doing anything.  They’re not helping you.”  In fact, sometimes, it could be a hindrance in us providing the prostheses that’s going to work well.  It’s not easy to walk people into sacrificing a tooth where that tooth, by itself, is okay, but in the big picture, it’s really not doing much in terms of benefitting the patient.

So, we see another patient now who’s coming in who has no teeth left in their jaw at all, and what you’re looking at is the upper jaw and lower jaw.  This is an X-ray.  It’s called panorex.  Many of you may have had it.  You stand in this machine, and it swings around your head.  It gives you a very good global view of what’s going on with the jaw.  What you’re seeing here is the sinus cavity.  This is the lower jaw, tongue space back here.  We’re using this to look to see if any teeth are left behind, any roots are left behind, how much bone somebody has because we know when teeth are lost, the bone continue to shrink overtime.  It’s not going to stay the way it is.

We also know that this bone loss is an ongoing process.  The gums and the bone that were there, were there to support teeth. When the teeth are lost, that bone and gum has lost their purpose, and they will slowly shrink away.  So, if you look at children who were born with no teeth, they don’t have the bone and the gum to start with because there were no teeth that were formed, and therefore, they’re down to what we call basal bone or just the skeletal part of it.  There’s none of that alveolus or alveolar part that holds the teeth.

We also know that the lower jaw bone shrinks or loses its bone at about three times the rate of the upper jaw bone.  There’s been studies that have gone on for over 25 years that have followed these patients which is significant to us because it’s the lower jaw that’s always more problematic for patients with dentures.  Therefore, if we know they’re going to keep losing bone at a much more rapid rate, we want to be able to intervene and do something that maybe we can do something to stop that process or at least slow it down to be able to maintain it over a long period of time.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

How to Remove Asbestos Safely

asbestos removal processAsbestos can be found in thousands of buildings worldwide, particularly in factories, older homes, and commercial properties. Many cancer deaths occurring today are a legacy of past occupational exposure to asbestos. This material is responsible for over 85 percent of all mesothelioma cases. It’s also one of the main contributing factors to asbestosis, lung cancer, obstructive pulmonary disease, and upper respiratory problems. Some of these deadly diseases have a long latency period of 30-40 years, which makes diagnosis, which makes treatment impossible.

Where Is Asbestos Commonly Found?

This material was commonly used in most industries before the ’80s. Textile mills, construction companies, plumbing agencies, and insulation workers were handling asbestos every day. Carpenters, shipbuilders, and war veterans may be at a particularly high risk.

Despite the bans, this mineral can still be found in older buildings. Common sources of asbestos include the popular “cottage cheese ceiling” or popcorn ceiling, technical ducts, roofing tiles, cement, rope, and flooring. The use of asbestos reached its peak in the mod 1970s. Since then, millions of workers and their families have been exposed to asbestos containing products.

Is It Safe to Remove Asbestos?

Asbestos exposure isn’t always dangerous to human health. Several factors can help determine how it affects an individual. These include:

• The source of exposure
• Size and shape of asbestos fibers
• Duration of exposure
• Amount of asbestos inhaled
• Pre-existing lung disease
• Overall health

It’s important to be aware that asbestos fibers might not pose any risk unless they become damaged. Simple things, such as drilling holes in walls, renovating your home, and making repairs, can disturb asbestos fibers and allow them to drop off into the air. When ingested or breathed in, these microscopic fibers cause damage to the lungs, stomach, and cardiovascular system.

The risk also depends on the type of material. For example, floor tiles contain non-friable asbestos, so the risk of exposure is minimal. Popcorn ceilings are extremely friable, which means that they can easily release asbestos fibers.

Different countries have different laws regarding asbestos removal procedures. In general, this procedure is recommended only when the fibers can easily be made into airborne dust. If you decide to hire a contractor, it’s your responsibility to check his credentials. The specialist contract must be able to provide proof of training, specialist equipment testing, liability insurance, and licensing. He should also have accreditation from a recognized trade organization.

Asbestos Removal Procedures

Asbestos can be removed, enclosed, or encapsulated to prevent exposure. If you choose to have it removed from your home or workplace, the contractor will seal off the area using negative air pressure, duct tape, and polyethylene film. Basically, he will pull fresh air in the affected area and then use a powerful vacuum cleaner to clean up any remaining fibers. In some cases, asbestos removal can take longer and cost more than demolition of the building.

Covering (enclosure) and sealing (encapsulation) are cheaper than removal of asbestos fibers. These methods involve using a sealant or duct tape to prevent the fibers from being released in the air.

Source: http://orange-restoration.com/services/san-diego-asbestos-removal/

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
You might also likeclose


Promoted by: San Diego SEO & Dental Marketing
(619) 630-7174. All Copyright © 2017 besttoothpaste.net or its affiliates.